On the morning of Indiana's crucial GOP primary, Donald Trump seconded on May 3 the explosive allegation that Rafael Cruz, father of presidential rival Ted Cruz, helped Lee Harvey Oswald distribute pro-Castro leaflets in New Orleans three months before President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas in 1963.
“His
father was with Lee Harvey Oswald prior to Oswald's being — you know,
shot. I mean, the whole thing is ridiculous,” Trump said May 3 during a
phone interview with Fox News, referring to the man in the necktie at
center in the photo. “What is this, right prior to his [JFK] being shot,
and nobody even brings it up? They don't even talk about that. That was
reported, and nobody talks about it.”
"This is nuts," Ted Cruz responded in defending his father from
Trump's charges as voting began during Indiana's crucial primary May 3.
"This man [Trump] is a pathological liar....The man is utterly amoral.
Morality does not exist for him."
Regardless of what one thinks of Trump, reaction to his comments May 3
illustrate how he threatens the Washington establishment, including
reporters and pundits who suppress and otherwise slant important news
regarding election campaigns and other major events.
Federal authorities and the major media have always argued in essence
that Oswald acted alone to kill JFK on Nov. 22, 1963. True, the
establishment occasionally floats also oddball theories attributed to
cranks and "conspiracy theorists."
But their repeated conclusion is that Oswald killed JFK alone, as we reported in Major Media Stick With Oswald 'Lone Gunman' JFK Theory, even
though many serious researchers, law enforcement and scientific whistle
blowers, and other suppressed voices have long argued that Oswald was a
scapegoat who acted with others at a minimum, and may even have been
innocent of killing either JFK or a Dallas policeman that day.
Update: Ted Cruz suspended
his campaign after Trump trounced him in Indiana's primary by a 53-37
percent margin. Trump was winning also the vast majority of the 57
delegates at stake. In the Democratic race, Bernie Sanders upset Hillary
Clinton 52-48 percent with most votes tabulated.
Critics of the 1964 Warren Commission draw on a vast array of
evidence to show involvement, often compartmentalized by those who did
not know the ultimate result of their actions, by rogue elements of
government, business, the mob, and Cuban refugee community, with the
result that Kennedy was replaced.
To hint at such a monstrous concept means career oblivion even now
for prominent officials, pundits and academics. That has long been the
case. Declassified 1960s documents show that the CIA orchestrated a
campaign to discredit as a "conspiracy theorist" those who suggested
government misconduct in the JFK case and subsequent mysterious events
extending to the present. We summarized the evidence in a 2014 column: Don't Be Fooled By 'Conspiracy Theory' Smears.
That pattern helps explain the instant attacks on Trump May 3 and
absence of virtually any commentator willing to explore whether his
comments might have a basis in fact worth exploring.
In contrast, investigative reporter Wayne Madsen first reported April
7 evidence strongly suggesting that Rafael Cruz was the mystery man
photographed handing out literature on Aug. 16, 1963 outside the
International Trade Mart. New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison
later unsuccessfully prosecuted the trade mart's leader Clay Shaw on
claims of conspiring to murder the president in a plot involving the
president's opponents.
Nonetheless, Madsen was careful not to conclude definitively it was
Cruz and indeed appeared on a New Orleans radio station that week asking
listeners for help in an ongoing investigation on the mystery man's
identity. Similarly, Trump supporter Scottie Nell Hughes aptly told a
CNN audience that Trump was raising questions about the photo and
related research, and not accusing Ted Cruz's father of plotting murder.
By contrast, dishonest commentators are fudging all distinctions to
ridicule any further inquiry.
In the photo above by the late Johann Rush of WSDU-TV in New Orleans,
Oswald is at front left in a white shirt and necktie. He stands next to
man never publicly identified by the Warren Commission, center, and
also in white shirt. They were handing out leaflets for the Fair Play
for Cuba Committee outside the International Trade Mart in New Orleans
on Aug. 16, 1963. The National Enquirer reported that is has determined
through photo analysis that the man is Rafael B. Cruz, father of GOP
presidential candidate Ted Cruz.
The mainstream media of major newspapers, wire services and broadcast
networks have always been virtually unified in denunciations of
Garrison and his team. Their chorus that has remained largely in place
until today in a way that can only be understood by those exploring the
key roles of the CIA and its empire-building, anti-Communist goals on
behalf the agency's Wall Street and other oligarchial controllers and
using such allies as major media, the Cuban exile community, organized
crime, and military contractors.
Thus Madsen's reporting -- which has been amplified by an Indiana
blogger Gary Welsh (found dead over the weekend), the McClatchy News
Service, then the National Enquirer in a cover story last week, and now
Trump -- represents a remarkable challenge to the government and media
establishment and all who hope for career success within those career
paths.
But
that does not mean that Rafael Cruz was not passing out literature in
New Orleans with Cruz. Indeed, a full examination of the circumstances
would suggest it is highly likely that those with Wallace were not
simply heavily comprised of government assets and Cubans. Indeed, Rafael
Cruz has lived his life in largely mysterious fashion in key details,
despite publishing a memoir this years and advocating as a that God's
will is that Americans elect his son as president.
Our own Justice Integrity Project reporting through the years and
more intensively since Madsen's scoop suggest compelling evidence that
the elder Cruz was indeed part of Oswald's effort in New Orleans. Yet
major media are now nearly unanimous in continuing the cover up of any
thorough inquiry, which could readily be accomplished with in-depth
interviews of surviving participants, release of suppressed documents or
even a grand jury investigation.
Instead, Madsen (shown in a file photo) and the National Enquirer are
now the targets of venom by both the mainstream media and those on
alternative website whose chose tool is snark, not any demonstrable
knowledge of the JFK or other political assassinations or sex scandals.
By contrast, Madsen with a three-part series in 2006 broke the story
that House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) was a gay pedophile hiding his
past as a lecherous high school wrestling coach. The mainstream ignore
the series and now never gives him credit despite Hastert's guilty plea
and sentencing. Similarly, the Enquirer has broken many major scandals
covered up elsewhere and yet is automatically ridiculed even though it
has almost never had to pay a verdict for defamation for wrong
reporting.
No comments:
Post a Comment