Paul Craig Roberts
First announcements. Then content.
In responses to my questions about the usefulness of the newsletter
service that informs you of new postings to the website, a number of you
confused the “newsletter” with the website and urged me to continue to
write. The question is not whether or not I continue to write. That
depends on your financial support of the website. The “newsletter,”
perhaps a wrong choice of words by the person who designed the website,
is merely a notice that new material has been posted. The “newsletter”
is not the site. As the “newsletter” service is costly and is about to
break into a higher cost because of the growing number of subscribers,
what I had hoped to learn was how important the notices of new postings
are to the one-third of you who actually open the notices.
Because a substantial percentage of respondants confused the
“newsletter” with the content of the website, it remains unclear to me
the value of the notice service.
Here is the deal: Those of you who subscribe to the notices of new
postings but do not bother to open the notices, please unsubscribe. The
opportunity to unsubscribe is available on every email notice you
receive of new postings. Please do not send emails to me to unsubscribe
you, as only you can unsubscribe yourself. Just as the website has no
control over your credit card and cannot charge you for a donation, the
website cannot unsubscribe you. Only you can do that.
If I find that the remaining subscribers to the notice service
actually open the notices, I will continue the service. If I find that
non-donors are imposing costs on the website for a non-used service, I
will discontinue the “newsletter.” The website will still exist and you
can access it by going to www.paulcraigroberts.org, which is what most
readers do. Alternatively, you can set up a RSS feed to notify you of
new postings.
This website has some very committed supporters. Some make automatic
monthly donations so that there is revenue flow during the periods
between my quarterly requests. Others donate generously depending on
their circumstances in response to the quarterly requests for your
support. Remember, I retired from my syndicated column, and it was
readers’ requests that caused me to create this website and to continue
to write.
I thank you for your commitment. It is what sustains the website and
my commitment to all the work it takes to explain reality in contrast
to the matrix of lies in which Western peoples live. My columns are
re-posted by many websites and are translated into a large number of
languages. This large readership is sustained by a relatively small
number of donors.
It is like Margaret Mead said, “a small number of committed people can change the world.”
With much help from the failures of neoliberal economic policy and neoconservative foreign policy, we are changing the world.
Look at Bernie Sanders’ inroads on the corrupt Clintons’ control of
the Democratic Party. Look at how easily Donald Trump defeated the
Republican establishment’s candidates. Some Americans are catching on,
shedding their unawareness. I am not confident that Sanders or Trump
could bring change. In The Deep State (2016), Mike Lofgren
concludes that powerful private interest groups, such as the
military/security complex and the financial sector, have hijacked
democracy. Still, voters’ interest in Sanders and Trump, despite the
beating they receive in the media, is a positive sign. Voters are
supporting them not so much for their positions on issues as for the
fact that neither are part of the Washington establishment. Many voters
now understand that the political establishment represents the One
Percent, not them.
A New Russia has appeared on the scene and demonstrated to the entire
world its power to checkmate the hegemonic ambition of the crazed
neoconservatives who have controlled the US government since Bill
Clinton. The world now understands that the leadership for peace comes
from Russia not from warmonger Washington.
Washington’s vassals in Europe are in disarray, with the Northern
European EU members plundering the Southern EU members, with all of
Europe overrun with refugees fleeing Washington’s hoax “war against
terrorism.” Europeans are beginning to realize that the establishment
political parties that they have blindly supported since World War 2 are
nothing but agents of Washington, who serve Washington and not
Europeans. Merkel, Cameron, Hollande are puppets of Washington, not
leaders of the German, British, and French people.
The Chinese government is finally beginning to realize that the
neoliberal American economic policies that it has so slavishly been
copying have led it into economic difficulties. Perhaps China will now
cease to follow America into oblivion.
The Russians have learned that being part of the Western system
subjects them to economic sanctions and makes it easy for Washington to
interfere in Russian internal affairs. The Russians are beginning to
show that their desire for their independence is greater than their
desire to be accepted by a corrupt, immoral, decadent, and failing West.
Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders speak to Americans’ loss of economic
opportunity and financial independence. Today the 99 Percent are slaves
to their debt burdens and lack of productive employment, while those
who deceived them into these burdens and lowly-paid employment in
domestic services are reveling in multi-million dollar annual paychecks.
The US Treasury, Federal Reserve, and financial regulators are
corrupted by the private financial interests that control them. The US
government serves only the One Percent. Despite this obvious fact, many
Democratic Party voters—-traditionally the less well off, union members,
and American blacks—-are turning out for Hillary Clinton, a tried and
proven representative of the One Percent. The Clintons have been
enriched to the amount of $153 million by the ruling One Percent who own
the Clintons lock, stock, and barrel. Yet the dispossessed vote for
Hillary. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/
Clearly, many American voters, as Thomas Frank made clear in his book, What’s the Matter with Kansas?, still have no clue as to their own interests and vote to elect their worst enemies.
Many Americans are still trapped in The Matrix and kept there by the propaganda that masquerades in the US as “news.”
Consider the possible implications if Americans were to enable
Hillary Clinton to become President. Trump has said that he would work
things out with Vladimir Putin, but Hillary has declared the President
of Russia to be “the new Hitler.” How can Hillary work anything out
with “the new Hitler”? She cannot.
It is a great irony that the American lower class, traditionally
served by the Democratic Party, could put in the White House not only a
person who only represents the super-rich but also a person who cannot
escape confict with Russia, a country with possibly the most capable
military force on the planet.
The psychopathic Washington neoconservatives who have controlled US
foreign policy since the Clinton regime, misintepret Vladimir Putin’s
peaceful diplomacy as a sign of Russian weakness. The neocons say: “See
Putin is weak. He is pulling out of Syria.” But what Putin says is
different. Putin says: “We have created the conditions for peace in
Syria.” If Washington abuses these conditions, “Russia can, in several
hours, build up its forces in Syria to a size capable of dealing with an
escalating situation and use the entire range of means at its
disposal.”
Putin adds: “We hope the parties involved would show common sense.”
From a position of strength, Putin has rolled the dice. Is there
common sense in the West? I fail to see any. I see arrogance, hubris,
idiocy, immorality, inhumanity, complete and total stupidity. These are
the characteristics of Western governments. They amount to a deranged
criminal enterprise organized against humanity.
In the awards of medals to those Russians who served against ISIS,
Putin stated: “Our uncompromising attitude to terrorism remains
unchanged.” If we take this statement broadly, it means not merely
Muslim jihadists but the terrorism of the West—-the destruction of seven
or more countries by the US and its vassals in the 21st century, the
long-term sanctions against Iran, Russia, and a number of other
countries whose governments do not comply with Washington’s dictates.
Putin has told Washington and Washington’s European puppets, Cameron,
Merkel, Hollande, that he has had enough of them. They must reform
themselves, become honorable governments committed to the welfare of
humanity, and abandon self-serving policies of plunder.
Considering the total failure of the United States to subdue after 15
years a few thousand lightly armed Taliban, the American people need to
understand that the US military, corrupted by privatizations to enhance
former vice president Dick Cheney’s stock options in Halliburton and by
over-cost weapons systems that serve the profits of the armaments
industries and not the military competence of the fighting force, has
lost its edge in weapons superiority. The latest over-cost American
fighter jet, for example, according to the Air Force’s own conclusions
cannot match the old figher it is intended to replace, whereas the
lastest Russian fighter is said to have the capability to electronically
shut down American control systems, track simultaneously 24 enemy
fighters and lock on 10 simultanteously for unavoidable destruction.
Members of the US military command have expressed concern over the high
quality of Russian weapon systems.
Everyone needs to understand that the establishments of the two
American political parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, are less
interested in winning the election than in continuing to control the
party. Trump and Sanders are hated by the party establishments, because
Trump and Sanders are not members of the establishment. Control over
the party by the party establishment is so important that we have many
members of the Republican establishment declaring that if Trump wins the
Republican nomination, they will vote for the Democrat. This has
happened before. It was Republicans that denied the presidency to
Republican candidate Barry Goldwater.
The United States is a failing society. Citizens’ hopes are being
snuffed out. There are few good jobs or enough jobs of any kind, as the
collapse of the labor force participation rate confirms. People are
drowning in debts that they have no prospect of ever paying off. Young
adults cannot form independent households. The oligarchy that rules and
controls the country has committed America to massively expensive wars
and privacy invasions for the purpose of establishing a hegemony that
enriches elite private interests.
The corupt and unrepentant financial sector, having survived its
mortgage-backed security fiasco without prosecution or correction has
repeated its previous folly with a new weapon of potential financial
mass destrution. Speculators have bought up distressed properties and
rented them. The rental streams are bundled into financial instruments,
as were the mortgage payments previously, and sold to investors. Is a
renter more committed and better able to pay than a person with a
mortgage?
Jobs offshoring and financialization have drained the US economy of
the ability to grow. The ladders of upward mobility have been
dismantled, and the service of debt curtails consumer demand for goods
and services. The wage saving from offshoring jobs raises corporate
profits and brings executive bonuses and capital gains to the One
Percent. Financialization diverts consumer purchasing power into the
service of debt. The result is stagnation and decline.
Foreign policy based on threats and coercion means constant conflict.
The US has been in constant conflict since the Clinton regime overthrew
the government in Serbia. Constant conflict is expensive, and Americans
have had these expensive costs imposed on them simultaneously with the
costs of jobs offshoring and financialization.
It was 20 months ago that Malaysian Airlines flight 17 was destroyed
over Ukraine. Despite the inability of the investigation to come to a
conclusion, from the first moment Western propaganda has blamed the loss
of 298 lives on Russia. Three days after the airliner’s destruction,
US Secretary of State John Kerry set in stone the blame on Russia with
his claim that “we saw the take-off [of the Buk missile]. We saw the
trajectory. We saw the hit. We saw this airplane disappear from the
radar screens. So there is really no mystery about where it came from
and where these weapons have come from.” http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ever-curiouser-mh-17-case/5514946
If the US has all the evidence, why hasn’t the US government released
it? Obviously, there is no such evidence. Why would Washington fail
to release evidence that proved Russian responsibility? Kerry’s
evidence no more exists than the alleged evidence the US government
claims to have from numerous security cameras that a passenger airliner
hit the Pentagon on 9/11. If the government had such evidence why has
the government refused to release it for almost 15 years? If the
government produced this evidence, it would be a death blow to the 9/11
Truth movement. The evidence no more exists than the alleged evidence
that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, that Iran had a
nuclear weapons program, that Assad used chemical weapons, that Russia
invaded Ukraine.
The terms of the last three US presidents have been used to squander
trillions of dollars on pointless wars and construction of a domestic
police state on the basis of a non-existant “terrorist threat.” This
alleged threat has been reinforced with false flag events and a fake
history spun from lies repeateded endlessly by government and its
presstitutes.
In 1994 Christopher Lasch wrote in The Revolt of the Elites:
“In our time, the chief threat seems to come from those at the top of
the social hierarchy.” As Lasch said, the greed of the elites for money
and power have undermined the constitutional basis of the United
States. The elites have used their power to betray democracy. Will the
American people succeed in clawing back their democracy?